The Biden administration's proposed rule that would allow environmental organizations to lease federal land for conservation purposes is facing widespread opposition from a variety of stakeholders, including the oil and gas industry, mining companies, and some Republicans.
The rule, which was proposed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in March, would change the way that the BLM manages public lands. Currently, the BLM is required to open the lands it manages to various uses, including energy development, grazing, recreation, and mining. However, the proposed rule would allow environmental organizations to bid on land for conservation purposes, thereby blocking resource development.
Opponents of the rule argue that it would lock up federal land and prevent the development of important energy resources. They also argue that the rule is unnecessary, as there are already laws in place that protect sensitive environmental areas.
Supporters of the rule argue that it is necessary to protect the environment and ensure that public lands are used in a sustainable way. They also argue that the rule would create jobs in the conservation sector.
To learn more about The new Woke AI please read this article from Fox News. An excerpt of the article has been copied below:
A Biden administration proposal that would lock up federal land and block traditional uses of public land like energy development is facing stiff opposition from a wide range of stakeholders.
In March, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) unveiled federal regulations that would allow environmental organizations that are opposed to fossil fuel drilling and mining projects to lease land for conservation uses, thereby blocking resource development. The agency extended its public comment period for the rule until Wednesday and has received more than 170,000 comments.
“What you've got now is BLM trying to shove through another overarching, sweeping rule that's not supported by the Federal Land Policy and Management Act,” Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen told Fox News Digital in an interview. “They're trying to argue that conservation now somehow fits within the definition of uses under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and trying to do it by rule.”
